# 12 April 2007       
# data file for Andreon (2005, A&A 448, 447)
#
# the following table gives the measured m* and its 68 % confidence intervals 
# as a function of redshift, as derived for a sample of 32 colour-selected 
# clusters at 0.2<z<1.22. It is shown as red region of Fig 5 in Andreon 
# (2005, A&A 448, 447), and has been derived as described in Sec 5.2.
#
#   redshift mstar  mstar_low68    mstar_hi68

         0.2 14.88     14.78	     14.98
         0.3 15.62     15.52	     15.72
         0.4 16.03     15.93	     16.13
         0.5  16.3      16.2	      16.4
         0.6 16.49     16.39	     16.59
         0.7 16.68     16.58	     16.78
         0.8 16.82     16.72	     16.92
         0.9 16.93     16.83	     17.03
           1 17.05     16.95	     17.15
         1.1 17.19     17.09	     17.29
         1.2 17.32     17.22	     17.42
         1.3 17.44     17.34         17.54

# the following table shows what would be found, using the very same 
# observational data, using the standard astronomical analysis, deprecated 
# in Sec 5.1, and plotted as dots and error bars in Fig 5. 
# 
#     redshift     mstar       mstar_error

         0.3       15.99        0.22
         0.5       16.16        0.15
         0.8       16.93        0.26
         1.1       17.06        0.16

# I strongly suggest to plot values given in the first (top) table
# for example connecting values, or shading the region between mstar_low68
# and mstar_hi68, instead of the values in the second (bottom) table, 
# which, furthermore, don't make the best use of available data, 
# as it is obvious from the size of the error on mstar (0.1 mag for the 
# top table, >0.15 for the bottom table), unless one has a good
# reason to prefer a worser analysis to a better one.