# 12 may 2014
# data file for Andreon (2013, A&A 554, A79) fig 7.
# check against it!
# the following table gives the measured LF and its 68 % intervals 
# for a sample of 5 clusters spectroscopically confirmed and
# with unambigous detection of ICM (i.e. sure clusters) at 1.4<z<1.8
# mean_z= 1.58
# mass uses SSP zf=2.5 BC03 version 2007, mass=integral SFR.
# 
# the shading, i.e. the properly derived LF. 
#       [3.6]   lgM   lgmeanLF   upper68%  lower68%
#
          15    12.06  -2.622    -2.552   -3.612
        15.1    12.02  -2.403    -2.333   -3.309
        15.2    11.98  -2.201    -2.124   -3.032
        15.3    11.94  -2.015     -1.94   -2.781
        15.4     11.9  -1.844    -1.764   -2.451
        15.5    11.86  -1.688    -1.618   -2.235
        15.6    11.82  -1.544     -1.47   -2.048
        15.7    11.78  -1.412    -1.336   -1.871
        15.8    11.74  -1.291    -1.183   -1.567
        15.9     11.7  -1.181    -1.095   -1.468
          16    11.66  -1.079   -0.9389   -1.269
        16.1    11.62 -0.9862   -0.8787    -1.19
        16.2    11.58 -0.9011   -0.8393   -1.191
        16.3    11.54 -0.8233   -0.7442   -1.025
        16.4     11.5  -0.752    -0.675  -0.9462
        16.5    11.46 -0.6868   -0.6039  -0.8541
        16.6    11.42 -0.6272   -0.5599  -0.8346
        16.7    11.38 -0.5727   -0.5018  -0.7662
        16.8    11.34 -0.5229   -0.4286  -0.6726
        16.9     11.3 -0.4774   -0.4102  -0.6778
          17    11.26 -0.4357   -0.3704  -0.6371
        17.1    11.22 -0.3977   -0.2943   -0.528
        17.2    11.18  -0.363   -0.2856  -0.5297
        17.3    11.14 -0.3313   -0.2707  -0.5429
        17.4     11.1 -0.3023   -0.2432   -0.512
        17.5    11.06 -0.2759   -0.2159  -0.4872
        17.6    11.02 -0.2518   -0.1934  -0.4653
        17.7    10.98 -0.2297   -0.1625  -0.4188
        17.8    10.94 -0.2096   -0.1345  -0.3866
        17.9     10.9 -0.1912   -0.1168  -0.3679
          18    10.86 -0.1745    -0.101  -0.3509
        18.1    10.82 -0.1592      -0.1   -0.365
        18.2    10.78 -0.1452  -0.07234  -0.3234
        18.3    10.74 -0.1325  -0.04551  -0.2754
        18.4     10.7 -0.1208  -0.03539   -0.269
        18.5    10.66 -0.1102  -0.02557  -0.2577

# the data points (rescaled by phi*). There is no reason to
# plot this (approximated) LF with approximated errors
# unless one has a good
# reason to prefer a worser analysis to a better one.
#
#      [3.6]    lgM      lgN       up err      down err
#
       15.75    11.76	 -1.376       0.218	 0.4582
       16.25    11.56	 -1.006        0.18	 0.3128
       16.75    11.36	-0.2893     0.07024	0.08384
       17.25    11.16	-0.3617     0.07974	0.09775
       17.75    10.96	-0.2767     0.07343	0.08842
       18.25    10.76	-0.4742      0.1484	 0.2272